Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fintech Fetch
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoins
      • Blockchain
      • DeFi
    • AI News
    • Stock News
    • Learn
      • AI for Beginners
      • AI Tips
      • Make Money with AI
    • Reviews
    • Tools
      • Best AI Tools
      • Crypto Market Cap List
      • Stock Market Overview
      • Market Heatmap
    • Contact
    Fintech Fetch
    Home»AI News»Mistral AI Releases Leanstral 1.5: An Apache-2.0 Lean 4 Code Agent Model Solving 587 of 672 PutnamBench Problems
    AI News

    Mistral AI Releases Leanstral 1.5: An Apache-2.0 Lean 4 Code Agent Model Solving 587 of 672 PutnamBench Problems

    July 4, 20266 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    changelly

    rewrite this content and keep HTML tags as is. This is content from rss feed and I don’t need their *Daily Debrief Newsletter*, their tags from bottom like this *Share this articleCategoriesTags*, Editorial Process section, phrases like *Featured image from Peakpx, chart from Tradingview.com*, SPECIAL OFFERS and similar sections – just remove such sections and save only article itself:

    Today, Mistral AI released Leanstral 1.5. It is a code agent model built for Lean 4. The release targets automated theorem proving and proof engineering. Weights are open under Apache 2.0. A free API endpoint, leanstral-1-5, is now live.

    Leanstral 1.5 updates the earlier Leanstral-2603 model. It belongs to the Mistral Small 4 family.

    What is Leanstral 1.5

    Leanstral 1.5 is a code agent model for Lean 4, a proof assistant. A proof assistant checks every logical step mechanically. Lean 4 can express objects like perfectoid spaces and properties of Rust fragments.

    The architecture is a mixture-of-experts, or MoE. An MoE routes each token to a few specialized sub-networks. This keeps compute low while total capacity stays large. Leanstral uses 128 experts, with 4 active per token.

    murf

    Total size is 119B parameters, with 6.5B activated per token. Context length is 256k tokens. Input is multimodal, accepting text and image. Output is text only.

    How Mistral Trained Leanstral 1.5

    Training runs in three stages. These are mid-training, supervised fine-tuning, then reinforcement learning with CISPO. Two reinforcement-learning environments shaped the model’s agentic behavior.

    In the multiturn environment, the model receives a theorem statement. It must prove or disprove it. It submits a proof, then reads Lean compiler feedback. It refines across attempts until it succeeds or exhausts its budget.

    In the code agent environment, Leanstral works inside a raw filesystem. It edits files, runs bash commands, and uses the Lean language server. That server exposes goals, errors, and type information in real time.

    This lets it complete partial proofs, build auxiliary lemmas, and persist through context compaction. Compaction compresses earlier context so long tasks still fit the window. Correctness is verified by Mistral’s fork of SafeVerify against target theorems.

    Benchmarks and Performance

    Mistral team reports that Leanstral 1.5 saturates miniF2F. It reaches 100% on both the validation and test sets. It solves 587 of 672 PutnamBench problems.

    The model sets a new state-of-the-art on the FATE-H and FATE-X algebra benchmarks. Mistral lists 87% on FATE-H and 34% on FATE-X. On FLTEval, pass@1 rises from 21.9 to 28.9. Pass@8 rises from 31.9 to 43.2.

    FLTEval is built from real pull requests to the Fermat’s Last Theorem repository. On it, Leanstral surpasses Opus 4.6’s 39.6 at one-seventh the cost. It also widens its lead over open-source models three to ten times larger. Pass@8 means eight attempts are allowed per problem.

    BenchmarkLeanstral 1.5DetailminiF2F (val + test)100%Saturated, per MistralPutnamBench587 / 672~$4 per problemFATE-H87%New state-of-the-artFATE-X34%New state-of-the-artFLTEval pass@128.9Up from 21.9FLTEval pass@843.2Beats Opus 4.6’s 39.6

    On PutnamBench, Leanstral edges Seed-Prover 1.5 high by 7 problems. It does so at about $4 per problem. Mistral estimates Seed-Prover’s high setting near $300 or more per problem.

    That setting runs a budget of 10 H20-days per problem. Mistral also compares against Goedel-Architect and AxProverBase. It notes Aleph Prover costs roughly $54 to $68 per problem.

    Test-time scaling is the model’s defining behavior. Raising the token budget per attempt lifts PutnamBench Pass@8. Mistral team reports 44 solved at 50k, 244 at 200k, 493 at 1M, and 587 at 4M. The interactive explorer below lets you scrub across that same curve.

    ‘ + b.name + ‘

    ‘ +
    ‘

    ‘ + b.desc + ‘

    ‘ + b.score + ‘

    ‘ +
    ”;
    bg.appendChild(el);
    });
    var benchAnimated = false;
    function animateBench() {
    root.querySelectorAll(‘#lsx-bench-grid .lsx-bar > i’).forEach(function (i) {
    i.style.width = i.getAttribute(‘data-pct’) + ‘%’;
    });
    benchAnimated = true;
    }

    // —- Cost —-
    var costs = [
    { who: ‘Leanstral 1.5’, sub: ‘~$4 / problem’, val: 4, cls: ‘lsx-hero’, label: ‘~$4’ },
    { who: ‘Aleph Prover’, sub: ‘$54–68 / problem’, val: 61, cls: ‘lsx-mid’, label: ‘~$61’ },
    { who: ‘Seed-Prover 1.5 high’, sub: ’10 H20-days / problem’, val: 300, cls: ‘lsx-high’, label: ‘$300+’ }
    ];
    var cr = root.querySelector(‘#lsx-cost-rows’);
    costs.forEach(function (c) {
    var row = document.createElement(‘div’);
    row.className=”lsx-cost-row”;
    row.innerHTML = ‘

    ‘ + c.who + ” + c.sub + ‘

    ‘ +
    ” +
    ‘

    ‘ + c.label + ‘

    ‘;
    cr.appendChild(row);
    });
    function animateCost() {
    root.querySelectorAll(‘#lsx-cost-rows .lsx-cost-track > i’).forEach(function (i) {
    var v = +i.getAttribute(‘data-val’);
    var w = (Math.log10(v) / Math.log10(300)) * 100; // log scale, 300 = full
    i.style.width = Math.max(w, 8) + ‘%’;
    });
    }

    // —- Proof loop —-
    var steps = [
    { t: ‘Theorem statement’, d: ‘The model receives a goal in Lean 4 and must prove or disprove it.’ },
    { t: ‘Model submits a proof’, d: ‘Leanstral drafts a candidate proof term or tactic block.’ },
    { t: ‘Lean compiler checks it’, d: ‘The proof is compiled. Errors, goals, and types are returned.’ },
    { t: ‘Refine and retry’, d: ‘If it fails, the model reads feedback and revises its approach.’ },
    { t: ‘Proof compiles’, d: ‘On success the loop ends. Otherwise it continues until budget runs out.’ }
    ];
    var ls = root.querySelector(‘#lsx-loop-steps’);
    steps.forEach(function (s, i) {
    var el = document.createElement(‘div’);
    el.className=”lsx-step”;
    el.innerHTML = ‘

    ‘ + (i + 1) + ‘

    ‘;
    ls.appendChild(el);
    });
    var stepEls = ls.querySelectorAll(‘.lsx-step’);
    var attempt = 0, cur = -1, done = false;
    var runBtn = root.querySelector(‘#lsx-loop-run’);
    var statusEl = root.querySelector(‘#lsx-loop-status’);
    function renderLoop() {
    stepEls.forEach(function (e, i) { e.classList.toggle(‘on’, i === cur); });
    }
    runBtn.addEventListener(‘click’, function () {
    if (done) return;
    cur++;
    if (cur === 2) attempt++;
    if (cur >= steps.length – 1) {
    // reaching “proof compiles” — succeed on attempt 3 for illustration
    if (attempt >= 3) {
    cur = steps.length – 1; done = true;
    statusEl.innerHTML = ‘Proof compiled after ‘ + attempt + ‘ attempts. Verified by SafeVerify.’;
    } else {
    cur = 3; // refine and retry
    statusEl.textContent=”Attempt ” + attempt + ‘ failed. Reading compiler feedback, refining…’;
    }
    } else {
    statusEl.textContent=”Attempt ” + attempt + ‘ — step ‘ + (cur + 1) + ‘ of ‘ + steps.length + ‘.’;
    }
    renderLoop(); pushHeight();
    });
    root.querySelector(‘#lsx-loop-reset’).addEventListener(‘click’, function () {
    attempt = 0; cur = -1; done = false;
    statusEl.textContent=”Ready. Attempt 0 of budget.”;
    renderLoop(); pushHeight();
    });

    // —- Auto-resize for WordPress —-
    function pushHeight() {
    var h = root.offsetHeight + 40;
    if (window.parent) {
    window.parent.postMessage({ type: ‘lsx-resize’, height: h }, ‘*’);
    }
    }
    window.addEventListener(‘load’, function () { animateBench(); pushHeight(); });
    window.addEventListener(‘resize’, pushHeight);
    setTimeout(pushHeight, 300);
    })();

    aistudios
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Fintech Fetch Editorial Team
    • Website

    Related Posts

    A new chapter for MIT Reads | MIT News

    A new chapter for MIT Reads | MIT News

    September 21, 2026
    Gartner outlines four AI tiers in warehouse automation

    Gartner outlines four AI tiers in warehouse automation

    September 20, 2026
    GGUF vs GPTQ vs AWQ vs EXL2: LLM Model Formats Explained (2026)

    GGUF vs GPTQ vs AWQ vs EXL2: LLM Model Formats Explained (2026)

    September 19, 2026
    New AI technique could make minimally invasive surgeries safer and more precise | MIT News

    New AI technique could make minimally invasive surgeries safer and more precise | MIT News

    September 18, 2026
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Join our email newsletter and get news & updates into your inbox for free.


    Privacy Policy

    Thanks! We sent confirmation message to your inbox.

    10web
    Latest Posts
    A new chapter for MIT Reads | MIT News

    A new chapter for MIT Reads | MIT News

    September 21, 2026
    Cointelegraph

    Bitcoin Receives Fresh Bullish Indicator as Fisher Transform Shows Important Crossover

    September 21, 2026
    Bitcoin.com News

    A Touch More Orange: Saylor Indicates New Strategy for Purchasing Bitcoin

    September 20, 2026
    Optimism Releases Required Op Batcher V1 17 0 Upgrade

    Optimism Launches Essential Op Batcher V1.17.0 Update

    September 20, 2026

    DOGE Price Forecast: $1 Remains Possible, But DOGE Must First Overcome $0.09

    September 20, 2026
    coinbase
    LEGAL INFORMATION
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Top Insights
    Strives Buys 1,355 BTC as Bitcoin's Price Crosses $85K

    Strives Acquires 1,355 BTC as Bitcoin Surpasses $85,000 Mark

    September 21, 2026
    Bloomberg Analyst Warns Crypto Faces a Lose-Lose Scenario

    Zcash Remains Above $1,440 Following Sudden Rally Correction

    September 21, 2026
    bybit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 FintechFetch.com - All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.