Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Fintech Fetch
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoins
      • Blockchain
      • DeFi
    • AI News
    • Stock News
    • Learn
      • AI for Beginners
      • AI Tips
      • Make Money with AI
    • Reviews
    • Tools
      • Best AI Tools
      • Crypto Market Cap List
      • Stock Market Overview
      • Market Heatmap
    • Contact
    Fintech Fetch
    Home»AI News»How to Design an Agentic Workflow for Tool-Driven Route Optimization with Deterministic Computation and Structured Outputs
    How to Design an Agentic Workflow for Tool-Driven Route Optimization with Deterministic Computation and Structured Outputs
    AI News

    How to Design an Agentic Workflow for Tool-Driven Route Optimization with Deterministic Computation and Structured Outputs

    February 21, 20268 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    ledger

    rewrite this content and keep HTML tags as is. This is content from rss feed and I don’t need their *Daily Debrief Newsletter*, their tags from bottom like this *Share this articleCategoriesTags*, Editorial Process section, phrases like *Featured image from Peakpx, chart from Tradingview.com*, SPECIAL OFFERS and similar sections – just remove such sections and save only article itself:

    In this tutorial, we build a production-style Route Optimizer Agent for a logistics dispatch center using the latest LangChain agent APIs. We design a tool-driven workflow in which the agent reliably computes distances, ETAs, and optimal routes rather than guessing, and we enforce structured outputs to make the results directly usable in downstream systems. We integrate geographic calculations, configurable speed profiles, traffic buffers, and multi-stop route optimization, ensuring the agent behaves deterministically while still reasoning flexibly through tools.

    !pip -q install -U langchain langchain-openai pydantic

    import os
    from getpass import getpass

    if not os.environ.get(“OPENAI_API_KEY”):
    os.environ[“OPENAI_API_KEY”] = getpass(“Enter OPENAI_API_KEY (input hidden): “)

    Customgpt

    from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Tuple, Any
    from math import radians, sin, cos, sqrt, atan2

    from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, ValidationError

    from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
    from langchain.tools import tool
    from langchain.agents import create_agent

    We set up the execution environment and ensure all required libraries are installed and imported correctly. We securely load the OpenAI API key so the agent can interact with the language model without hardcoding credentials. We also prepare the core dependencies that power tools, agents, and structured outputs.

    SITES: Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]] = {
    “Rig_A”: {“lat”: 23.5880, “lon”: 58.3829, “type”: “rig”},
    “Rig_B”: {“lat”: 23.6100, “lon”: 58.5400, “type”: “rig”},
    “Rig_C”: {“lat”: 23.4500, “lon”: 58.3000, “type”: “rig”},
    “Yard_Main”: {“lat”: 23.5700, “lon”: 58.4100, “type”: “yard”},
    “Depot_1”: {“lat”: 23.5200, “lon”: 58.4700, “type”: “depot”},
    “Depot_2”: {“lat”: 23.6400, “lon”: 58.4300, “type”: “depot”},
    }

    SPEED_PROFILES: Dict[str, float] = {
    “highway”: 90.0,
    “arterial”: 65.0,
    “local”: 45.0,
    }

    DEFAULT_TRAFFIC_MULTIPLIER = 1.10

    def haversine_km(lat1: float, lon1: float, lat2: float, lon2: float) -> float:
    R = 6371.0
    dlat = radians(lat2 – lat1)
    dlon = radians(lon2 – lon1)
    a = sin(dlat / 2) ** 2 + cos(radians(lat1)) * cos(radians(lat2)) * sin(dlon / 2) ** 2
    return R * c

    We define the core domain data representing rigs, yards, and depots along with their geographic coordinates. We establish speed profiles and a default traffic multiplier to reflect realistic driving conditions. We also implement the Haversine distance function, which serves as the mathematical backbone of all routing decisions.

    def _normalize_site_name(name: str) -> str:
    return name.strip()

    def _assert_site_exists(name: str) -> None:
    if name not in SITES:
    raise ValueError(f”Unknown site ‘{name}’. Use list_sites() or suggest_site().”)

    def _distance_between(a: str, b: str) -> float:
    _assert_site_exists(a)
    _assert_site_exists(b)
    sa, sb = SITES[a], SITES[b]
    return float(haversine_km(sa[“lat”], sa[“lon”], sb[“lat”], sb[“lon”]))

    def _eta_minutes(distance_km: float, speed_kmph: float, traffic_multiplier: float) -> float:
    speed = max(float(speed_kmph), 1e-6)
    base_minutes = (distance_km / speed) * 60.0
    return float(base_minutes * max(float(traffic_multiplier), 0.0))

    def compute_route_metrics(path: List[str], speed_kmph: float, traffic_multiplier: float) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    if len(path) < 2:
    raise ValueError(“Route path must include at least origin and destination.”)
    for s in path:
    _assert_site_exists(s)
    legs = []
    total_km = 0.0
    total_min = 0.0
    for i in range(len(path) – 1):
    a, b = path[i], path[i + 1]
    d_km = _distance_between(a, b)
    t_min = _eta_minutes(d_km, speed_kmph, traffic_multiplier)
    legs.append({“from”: a, “to”: b, “distance_km”: d_km, “eta_minutes”: t_min})
    total_km += d_km
    total_min += t_min
    return {“route”: path, “distance_km”: float(total_km), “eta_minutes”: float(total_min), “legs”: legs}

    We build the low-level utility functions that validate site names and compute distances and travel times. We implement logic to calculate per-leg and total route metrics deterministically. This ensures that every ETA and distance returned by the agent is based on explicit computation rather than inference.

    def _all_paths_with_waypoints(origin: str, destination: str, waypoints: List[str], max_stops: int) -> List[List[str]]:
    from itertools import permutations
    waypoints = [w for w in waypoints if w not in (origin, destination)]
    max_stops = int(max(0, max_stops))
    candidates = []
    for k in range(0, min(len(waypoints), max_stops) + 1):
    for perm in permutations(waypoints, k):
    candidates.append([origin, *perm, destination])
    if [origin, destination] not in candidates:
    candidates.insert(0, [origin, destination])
    return candidates

    def find_best_route(origin: str, destination: str, allowed_waypoints: Optional[List[str]], max_stops: int, speed_kmph: float, traffic_multiplier: float, objective: str, top_k: int) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    origin = _normalize_site_name(origin)
    destination = _normalize_site_name(destination)
    _assert_site_exists(origin)
    _assert_site_exists(destination)
    allowed_waypoints = allowed_waypoints or []
    for w in allowed_waypoints:
    _assert_site_exists(_normalize_site_name(w))
    objective = (objective or “eta”).strip().lower()
    if objective not in {“eta”, “distance”}:
    raise ValueError(“objective must be one of: ‘eta’, ‘distance'”)
    top_k = max(1, int(top_k))
    candidates = _all_paths_with_waypoints(origin, destination, allowed_waypoints, max_stops=max_stops)
    scored = []
    for path in candidates:
    metrics = compute_route_metrics(path, speed_kmph=speed_kmph, traffic_multiplier=traffic_multiplier)
    score = metrics[“eta_minutes”] if objective == “eta” else metrics[“distance_km”]
    scored.append((score, metrics))
    scored.sort(key=lambda x: x[0])
    best = scored[0][1]
    alternatives = [m for _, m in scored[1:top_k]]
    return {“best”: best, “alternatives”: alternatives, “objective”: objective}

    We introduce multi-stop routing logic by generating candidate paths with optional waypoints. We evaluate each candidate route against a clear optimization objective, such as ETA or distance. We then rank routes and extract the best option along with a set of strong alternatives.

    @tool
    def list_sites(site_type: Optional[str] = None) -> List[str]:
    if site_type:
    st = site_type.strip().lower()
    return sorted([k for k, v in SITES.items() if str(v.get(“type”, “”)).lower() == st])
    return sorted(SITES.keys())

    @tool
    def get_site_details(site: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    s = _normalize_site_name(site)
    _assert_site_exists(s)
    return {“site”: s, **SITES[s]}

    @tool
    def suggest_site(query: str, max_suggestions: int = 5) -> List[str]:
    q = (query or “”).strip().lower()
    max_suggestions = max(1, int(max_suggestions))
    scored = []
    for name in SITES.keys():
    n = name.lower()
    common = len(set(q) & set(n))
    bonus = 5 if q and q in n else 0
    scored.append((common + bonus, name))
    scored.sort(key=lambda x: x[0], reverse=True)
    return [name for _, name in scored[:max_suggestions]]

    @tool
    def compute_direct_route(origin: str, destination: str, road_class: str = “arterial”, traffic_multiplier: float = DEFAULT_TRAFFIC_MULTIPLIER) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    origin = _normalize_site_name(origin)
    destination = _normalize_site_name(destination)
    rc = (road_class or “arterial”).strip().lower()
    if rc not in SPEED_PROFILES:
    raise ValueError(f”Unknown road_class ‘{road_class}’. Use one of: {sorted(SPEED_PROFILES.keys())}”)
    speed = SPEED_PROFILES[rc]
    return compute_route_metrics([origin, destination], speed_kmph=speed, traffic_multiplier=float(traffic_multiplier))

    @tool
    def optimize_route(origin: str, destination: str, allowed_waypoints: Optional[List[str]] = None, max_stops: int = 2, road_class: str = “arterial”, traffic_multiplier: float = DEFAULT_TRAFFIC_MULTIPLIER, objective: str = “eta”, top_k: int = 3) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    origin = _normalize_site_name(origin)
    destination = _normalize_site_name(destination)
    rc = (road_class or “arterial”).strip().lower()
    if rc not in SPEED_PROFILES:
    raise ValueError(f”Unknown road_class ‘{road_class}’. Use one of: {sorted(SPEED_PROFILES.keys())}”)
    speed = SPEED_PROFILES[rc]
    allowed_waypoints = allowed_waypoints or []
    allowed_waypoints = [_normalize_site_name(w) for w in allowed_waypoints]
    return find_best_route(origin, destination, allowed_waypoints, int(max_stops), float(speed), float(traffic_multiplier), str(objective), int(top_k))

    We expose the routing and discovery logic as callable tools for the agent. We allow the agent to list sites, inspect site details, resolve ambiguous names, and compute both direct and optimized routes. This tool layer ensures that the agent always reasons by calling verified functions rather than hallucinating results.

    class RouteLeg(BaseModel):
    from_site: str
    to_site: str
    distance_km: float
    eta_minutes: float

    class RoutePlan(BaseModel):
    route: List[str]
    distance_km: float
    eta_minutes: float
    legs: List[RouteLeg]
    objective: str

    class RouteDecision(BaseModel):
    chosen: RoutePlan
    alternatives: List[RoutePlan] = []
    assumptions: Dict[str, Any] = {}
    notes: str = “”
    audit: List[str] = []

    llm = ChatOpenAI(model=”gpt-4o-mini”, temperature=0.2)

    SYSTEM_PROMPT = (
    “You are the Route Optimizer Agent for a logistics dispatch center.\n”
    “You MUST use tools for any distance/ETA calculation.\n”
    “Return ONLY the structured RouteDecision.”
    )

    route_agent = create_agent(
    model=llm,
    tools=[list_sites, get_site_details, suggest_site, compute_direct_route, optimize_route],
    system_prompt=SYSTEM_PROMPT,
    response_format=RouteDecision,
    )

    def get_route_decision(origin: str, destination: str, road_class: str = “arterial”, traffic_multiplier: float = DEFAULT_TRAFFIC_MULTIPLIER, allowed_waypoints: Optional[List[str]] = None, max_stops: int = 2, objective: str = “eta”, top_k: int = 3) -> RouteDecision:
    user_msg = {
    “role”: “user”,
    “content”: (
    f”Optimize the route from {origin} to {destination}.\n”
    f”road_class={road_class}, traffic_multiplier={traffic_multiplier}\n”
    f”objective={objective}, top_k={top_k}\n”
    f”allowed_waypoints={allowed_waypoints}, max_stops={max_stops}\n”
    “Return the structured RouteDecision only.”
    ),
    }
    result = route_agent.invoke({“messages”: [user_msg]})
    return result[“structured_response”]

    decision1 = get_route_decision(“Yard_Main”, “Rig_B”, road_class=”arterial”, traffic_multiplier=1.12)
    print(decision1.model_dump())

    decision2 = get_route_decision(“Rig_C”, “Rig_B”, road_class=”highway”, traffic_multiplier=1.08, allowed_waypoints=[“Depot_1”, “Depot_2”, “Yard_Main”], max_stops=2, objective=”eta”, top_k=3)
    print(decision2.model_dump())

    We define strict Pydantic schemas to enforce structured, machine-readable outputs from the agent. We initialize the language model and create the agent with a clear system prompt and response format. We then demonstrate how to invoke the agent and obtain reliable route decisions ready for real logistics workflows.

    In conclusion, we have implemented a robust, extensible route optimization agent that selects the best path between sites while clearly explaining its assumptions and alternatives. We demonstrated how combining deterministic routing logic with a tool-calling LLM produces reliable, auditable decisions suitable for real logistics operations. This foundation allows us to easily extend the system with live traffic data, fleet constraints, or cost-based objectives, making the agent a practical component in a larger dispatch or fleet-management platform.

    Check out the Full Codes here. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 100k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well.

    livechat
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Fintech Fetch Editorial Team
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Meta AI and KAUST Researchers Propose Neural Computers That Fold Computation, Memory, and I/O Into One Learned Model

    Meta AI and KAUST Researchers Propose Neural Computers That Fold Computation, Memory, and I/O Into One Learned Model

    April 13, 2026
    logo

    Washington Is Getting Ready to Slow AI Down. And This Has Nothing to Do with Politics

    April 12, 2026
    A philosophy of work | MIT News

    A philosophy of work | MIT News

    April 11, 2026
    OpenAI introduces ChatGPT Pro $100 tier with 5X usage limits for Codex compared to Plus

    OpenAI introduces ChatGPT Pro $100 tier with 5X usage limits for Codex compared to Plus

    April 10, 2026
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Join our email newsletter and get news & updates into your inbox for free.


    Privacy Policy

    Thanks! We sent confirmation message to your inbox.

    bybit
    Latest Posts
    Justin Sun Slams WLFI Over Token Lockups, Gets Legal Threat in Response

    Justin Sun Slams WLFI Over Token Lockups, Gets Legal Threat in Response

    April 12, 2026
    How I Build and Sell $500+ Digital Products in Minutes with AI

    How I Build and Sell $500+ Digital Products in Minutes with AI

    April 12, 2026
    The Craziest AI Dropshipping System Just Dropped

    The Craziest AI Dropshipping System Just Dropped

    April 12, 2026
    The Most Dangerous AI Just Went Live

    The Most Dangerous AI Just Went Live

    April 12, 2026
    World Liberty Financial Threatens Tron Founder Justin Sun With Lawsuit as Frozen Token Dispute Goes Public – Crypto News Bitcoin News

    World Liberty Financial Warns Tron Creator Justin Sun of Legal Action as Token Dispute Becomes Public – Crypto Updates Bitcoin News

    April 12, 2026
    changelly
    LEGAL INFORMATION
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Top Insights
    Iran War Fallout Will Muddy the Rest of 2026 for Asset Markets: Analyst

    Analyst Predicts Iran War Aftermath Will Cloud Asset Markets Throughout 2026

    April 13, 2026
    Justin Sun Slams WLFI Over Token Lockups, Gets Legal Threat in Response

    Justin Sun Criticizes WLFI for Token Lockups, Faces Legal Threat in Reply

    April 13, 2026
    bybit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 FintechFetch.com - All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.