Close Menu
FintechFetch
    FintechFetch
    • Home
    • Fintech
    • Financial Technology
    • Credit Cards
    • Finance
    • Stock Market
    • More
      • Business Startups
      • Blockchain
      • Bitcoin News
      • Cryptocurrency
    FintechFetch
    Home»Fintech»What recent enforcement says about the future of financial crime monitoring: By Andrew Bonsall
    Fintech

    What recent enforcement says about the future of financial crime monitoring: By Andrew Bonsall

    FintechFetchBy FintechFetchOctober 15, 2025No Comments7 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    In July 2025, the FCA issued another multi-million pound fine for weaknesses in customer onboarding and transaction monitoring. Many financial services
    firms will recognise the issues exposed. Controls built on static rules and one-off checks are struggling to keep pace with the complexity of modern financial crime.

    The scale of the problem is significant. The National Crime Agency estimates that more than £100 billion is laundered through the UK each year. On top
    of that, Cifas recorded a record 217,000 fraud cases in the first half of 2025, including over 118,000 cases of identity fraud and more than 38,000 facility takeovers. Together, these figures highlight the widening gap between regulatory expectations and the
    reality of what many firms’ systems can deliver.

    That’s also where enforcement is heading. Regulators want to see controls that are active, adaptable, and driven by live behavioural data. Passing an onboarding
    check once isn’t enough. The real test is whether suspicious activity can be spotted early, with clear evidence to back it up.

    3 reasons why financial crime controls break down

    Many banks still rely on a combination of rules-based monitoring and point-in-time KYC. On paper, those processes might appear to meet compliance. In practice,
    they leave too much room for criminal activity to slip through.

    1. Rules don’t adapt

    Rules-based systems flag pre-set scenarios: a transaction over a certain amount, activity in a high-risk country, or an unusual frequency of payments. Once coded, those rules are slow
    to change. Criminals know this. They move just under thresholds, break up transactions, or adjust patterns to stay inside the system’s comfort zone. Tightening rules often just floods investigators with false positives, diverting attention from genuine threats.

    2. Profiles never update

    Onboarding KYC creates a snapshot in time. It shows who a customer was when the account was opened, not who they are today. Accounts that pass initial checks can be taken over months
    later, or drift into behaviours that no longer match the original profile. Without regular refresh, these changes are missed and by the time they trigger a rule, the damage is done.

    3. Outdated thinking

    The latest FCA fine is just one example of a much wider pattern. Many institutions are still using systems designed for an era when “check once and monitor occasionally” was sufficient.
    Regulators now expect controls that adapt continuously, informed by live behavioural data rather than static records.

    Regulatory expectations are changing

    Recent enforcement activity shows regulators want more than proof that monitoring exists. They want evidence that it works in practice, at speed, and against
    today’s highest-risk patterns.

    For the FCA, this means controls that can detect suspicious activity as it happens, understand the wider context, and adapt quickly when new typologies
    emerge. A series of small transfers, for example, may look harmless in isolation but takes on a different meaning when linked to other accounts in the network.

    The direction is consistent internationally. The EU’s new Anti-Money Laundering Authority will expect integrated, cross-border oversight. In the US, FinCEN
    is pushing for greater use of data analytics and technology to improve detection quality. Across the board, there’s an emphasis on:

    • Reducing low-value alerts

    • Retuning systems quickly when risks change

    • Demonstrating effectiveness with clear, defensible metrics

    Firms treating compliance as a periodic exercise are under increasing scrutiny. Monitoring has to evolve at the same pace as the threats it is built to
    detect.

    From one-off checks to continuous oversight

    Traditional monitoring processes create latency. Data is batched overnight, alerts appear hours or days later, and investigations follow in sequence. By
    then, funds have often moved beyond recovery.

    Real-time monitoring reduces much of that delay. It enables:

    • Behavioural profiling at speed: creating a live baseline for each customer and flagging activity that doesn’t fit

    • Network-aware detection: linking activity across accounts and institutions to spot patterns like layering or mule networks before
      they spread

    • Continuous KYC refresh: updating customer profiles as income sources, merchant categories, or transaction flows change, instead of
      waiting for a scheduled review

    This makes a measurable difference. Shortening the detection window lowers operational costs by reducing investigation volumes, increases the chances of
    recovering assets, and frees analysts to focus on the alerts that carry the highest risk. It also means firms can respond to new typologies faster, without the long lead times required for rule recoding or system updates.

    Delivering this capability is as much about design as it is about technology. Data infrastructure must handle live ingestion, monitoring and case management
    systems need to work seamlessly together, and governance processes have to support rapid action. When those elements align, firms are better able to meet regulatory expectations and build stronger defences against financial crime.

    Open Banking as an enabler for stronger controls

    Traditional monitoring still struggles with blind spots. It can track what happens inside a single institution, but not how funds move across accounts
    and providers. That lack of visibility is one reason suspicious activity can go undetected for weeks.

    Open Banking changes that. With customer consent, it delivers live transaction data across multiple accounts, regardless of provider.








    Capability

    Example in practice

    Benefit

    Multi-bank visibility

    Funds leaving a personal account and appearing hours later in a business account at another bank before being transferred offshore.

    Enables cross-institutional risk scoring and earlier disruption of laundering chains.

    Behavioural context

    A sudden series of cash deposits considered against historic income sources and transaction patterns.

    Reduces noise by separating true anomalies from legitimate lifestyle or business changes.

    Earlier anomaly detection

    A spike in transfers to high-risk merchants or crypto exchanges within 24 hours of an account takeover.

    Meets regulator expectations on timely identification of suspicious activity and increases asset recovery chances.

    Continuous KYC refresh

    Automatically updating a customer’s risk profile as income sources, spending categories, or geographies change.

    Keeps risk scoring current without relying on infrequent manual reviews or reactive updates.

    For senior leaders, the advantage is twofold: the ability to detect and disrupt suspicious activity earlier, and the ability to evidence that detection
    with complete, contextualised data. As regulators move towards continuous, adaptive controls, that combination is becoming a clear differentiator.

    Practical steps for financial services leaders

    Recent enforcement has shown regulators are focusing on how quickly and effectively firms can detect, investigate, and escalate suspicious activity. The
    priority is controls that work in practice and can be evidenced clearly.

    Step 1. Measure detection speed

    Track the time from suspicious activity to alert, and from alert to escalation. Set clear tolerances and monitor them consistently.

    Step 2. Analyse behaviour patterns

    Go beyond fixed rules by building a view of how each customer normally transacts — amounts, locations, counterparties, and payment types, and flag changes. Include connections between
    accounts to spot mule activity or coordinated transfers.

    Step 3. Use wider data sources

    Most undetected activity involves accounts outside a single institution. Bringing in live, regulated feeds such as Open Banking can reveal movements between accounts and providers that
    would otherwise be missed.

    Step 4. Keep KYC current

    Risk profiles should change when customer behaviour changes. Use triggers such as new income sources, different transaction types, or new geographies to update profiles and adjust monitoring
    accordingly.

    Step 5. Prove the system works

    Maintain dashboards that track alert times, case volumes, false positives, and outcomes. This provides an audit trail for regulators and highlights where improvements have the most effect.

    Step 6. Match governance to speed

    Fast detection without fast decision-making delivers little benefit. Escalation routes, decision-making authority, and investigation teams need to match the pace of alerts raised.

    When these steps are in place, detection is quicker, blind spots are reduced, and performance can be demonstrated with evidence regulators will accept.

    From months to minutes: The new standard for financial crime detection

    In financial crime, speed changes outcomes. The longer the delay, the greater the room for losses to mount, evidence to disappear, and trust to erode.
    Near-real-time detection transforms the way institutions can respond, making action faster and better informed.

    Open Banking data makes this possible. With regulated, real-time transaction insights, firms can close the window between suspicious activity and decisive
    action.

     



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThe creator economy won’t survive without fixing payments
    Next Article Historic Liquidation Event Highlights Solana Resilience Against Ethereum, Which Is Leading?
    FintechFetch
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Fintech

    DANA and Ant International Launch Digital Initiative for Marine Conservation in Indonesia

    October 17, 2025
    Fintech

    AI in banking: From experiment to imperative: By Alex Ford

    October 17, 2025
    Fintech

    XMR Prospects to 2030 : The Future of Privacy, Decentralization, and Financial Sovereignty: By Muhammad Qasim

    October 16, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Why non-dilutive funding is the future for SMEs?: By Katherine Chan

    March 2, 2025

    Bitcoin Supercycle? Jeff Park Says Gold’s $1T Gains Could Spark It

    October 3, 2025

    BTC USD Rockets Higher as Analysts Adjust to $200K Bitcoin Target Amid Retail Rush

    April 27, 2025

    Quotient Gets a New Home In Snowpark Container Services

    February 8, 2025

    Treasury Bonds Can Appreciate In Value Too – Don’t Ignore Them

    September 5, 2025
    Categories
    • Bitcoin News
    • Blockchain
    • Business Startups
    • Credit Cards
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Finance
    • Financial Technology
    • Fintech
    • Stock Market
    Most Popular

    Beyond Dashboards: Turning Fintech Data Chaos into Structured Context: By David Weinstein

    June 23, 2025

    Will AstraZeneca be the next FTSE 100 stock to move to the US?

    July 2, 2025

    XRP Price About To Make A New All-Time High Run To $5? Here’s What The Chart Says

    February 11, 2025
    Our Picks

    DANA and Ant International Launch Digital Initiative for Marine Conservation in Indonesia

    October 17, 2025

    Unlocking G20 Cross-Border Goals in APAC with Project Nexus

    October 17, 2025

    Employee ownership isn’t an exit plan—it’s a legacy

    October 17, 2025
    Categories
    • Bitcoin News
    • Blockchain
    • Business Startups
    • Credit Cards
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Finance
    • Financial Technology
    • Fintech
    • Stock Market
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Fintechfetch.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.